Why CBT for JAMB, WAEC & NECO But No Electronic Voting in Nigeria?
The Federal Government has fully committed to Computer-Based Testing (CBT) for major national examinations. JAMB has been running CBT for years, and WAEC and NECO are now mandated to fully transition. This decision reflects strong official confidence in technology to curb examination malpractice and improve efficiency for millions of Nigerian youths.
The Government’s Strong Belief in CBT for Exams
Despite recurring technical challenges, infrastructure gaps, and criticism, the government continues to expand CBT across the education sector. The clear message is that technology can be trusted to fairly assess students and reduce human interference in high-stakes examinations.
The Hesitation on Electronic Voting
However, when it comes to electing public officials, the same enthusiasm for technology is missing. Full electronic voting or even mandatory real-time electronic transmission of results continues to face resistance. INEC has introduced BVAS for accreditation, but paper-based collation and manual processes remain dominant in many areas.
The Contradiction That Needs Explanation
If the government trusts technology enough to examine millions of students annually through CBT, why is there such strong reluctance toward a robust electronic voting system for national and state elections? This selective application of technology raises important questions about consistency, political will, and trust in digital solutions.
Arguments For and Against E-Voting
Supporters argue that electronic voting would deliver faster results, reduce ballot snatching, minimise human manipulation, and create better audit trails. Critics, however, point to cybersecurity risks, infrastructure limitations in rural areas, the digital divide, and the potential for large-scale digital manipulation.
What This Means for Nigeria
At Kurrentech International (KTI World), we have successfully implemented secure CBT platforms and data management systems for educational institutions across Nigeria. We firmly believe that with proper planning, phased implementation, strong cybersecurity frameworks, and hybrid models, Nigeria has the capacity to develop trustworthy electronic voting infrastructure.
The technology and local expertise exist. The missing piece appears to be decisive political commitment and public trust-building.
Let the Debate Begin
Why does the government push CBT aggressively for exams but remain cautious with electronic voting? Is this a genuine concern about risks, or something deeper? Should Nigeria prioritise developing a credible e-voting system? What safeguards would you demand before trusting technology with our votes?
Share your strong opinions, arguments, and recommendations in the comment section below. This is one of the most important national conversations right now.
Be the first to share your perspective on this post. Your comment will appear once it is reviewed.